Pasi Hurttila Tuohipää Puukko Review

Pasi Hurttila Tuohipää Puukko Review
by Federico Buldrini

This puukko was hand made by Finnish blacksmith and craftsman Pasi Hurttila, native of Ulvila, but now living and working in Ivalo, 30 km from Lake Inari. Before dedicating himself to full-time blacksmithing he has been a wilderness guide for 10 years around Lappland and is still an eager hunter.
In his own words his goal is: “to craft effective tools, not microscope proof knives”. In addition to knives he forges all kinds of iron objects: from a nail to a railing.

f1a

f2a

f3a

f4a

Technical Data

All the measurements I’ll give are just of this specimen and have to be taken just for it. Since every puukko is individually made measurements will change slightly.

Blade
length: 97 mm
wideness: 23 mm
thickness: 3,5 mm at spine; 5 mm at thickest point
tang: 10×5 mm thick at peening
steel: Böhler K510
grind: flat
edge angle: 20°, with tiny microbevel
edge hardness: ~ 60 HRC

Handle
length: 110 mm
width: 30 mm max.
thickness: 21 mm max.

Weight
knife: 140 g
with sheath: 180 g

Overview

The knife comes simply enveloped in a paper sheet. The name Tuohipää means birch bark handle.The rhombic section blade was forged with a hand held hammer from Böhler K510, or “silversteel”, the European equivalent of Japanese Aogami “blue steel”.

Out of the box it was hair popping sharp.The heat treatment was made completely on the open fire of the charcoal forge by following the changing of the steel colour. After annealing and normalization the blade gets a partial oil quenching followed by two temperings.

Due to the nature of the handle the tang is wider and thicker, so the stacked bark is more sustained and the handle is unlikely to bend under harsh use, which may happen with a smaller tang.The handle, composed of stacked birch bark flaps compressed between two 5 mm thick brass bolsters, has a smooth and velvetly feeling, while being very grippy:
As I have already said in previous reviews, birch bark, naturally filled with essential oil, is waterproof and almost neutral towards shrinking from humidity changes. It’s texture provides a very firm grip whatever hands are tired, bloody or moist and gives always a warm feeling. The handle has a quite marked teardrop cross section.

The sheath was hand stitched from 2 mm thick cowhide and the leather of the mouth is folded inside so to increase the friction retention.It has a two sided birch protective liner, which was carved with this same puukko and a chisel.
The belt loop is attached with a triangular D-ring allowing great steadiness during walking but also leaving to the sheath the possibility to be easily moved away when needed. The only ready made part of this puukko is the brass button that closes the belt loop.

In Use

As stated the puukko alone weights 140 g, just a hair less than the Fällkiven F1. That’s not really light for a puukko, nevertheless, it’s still light enough on the belt and in the hand.

Keeping up the usual bird carving, this time I’ll do an arctic loon which, together with the red-throated loon, regularly nests around Lake Inari.
Now, I saw another piece from our four years seasoned oak and draw the bird shape. I then shave the upper side of the block and cut wood chips so to get nearer and rough out the back of the loon, I rough hew the throat too, then I carve the head and the neck. I finish by refining the throat.
Generally the loon was slightly trickier to carve than the goldeneye, especially due to the very small surface I could grip on to hold the work piece during the head carving.

Conclusions

No comfort problems were detectable all throughout the two and a half hours this work took me. The handle teardrop section, compared to the more hand filling oval one, gives to the knife increased agility and fluidity of control, while still leaving good substance to the handle.

The blade always kept a uniform bite “style” and a good agility in the tiny spaces of the loon back/neck junction, despite its width and almost absent taper. Due to its microbevel, just a hair bigger than the Malinen Koivumäki’s one, I noticed a bite just a little less deep, compensated by a slightly higher control over the wood quantity to be cut. This is actually noticeable if you have both puukko to compare.

At the end of all the edge was absolutely perfect and still shaved hair with just a little pressure.

f1

f2

f3

f4

f5

Advertisements

One response to “Pasi Hurttila Tuohipää Puukko Review

  1. good job and nice knive!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s